tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.comments2023-09-09T04:37:41.953-07:00Global Climate ChaosClimate Chaoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00375070925286838162noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-11177616736305448582010-01-16T11:37:30.900-08:002010-01-16T11:37:30.900-08:00Sorry to see you seem to have stopped blogging the...Sorry to see you seem to have stopped blogging the last month.<br /><br />You link to my blog, Heliogenic Climate Change, under your left-column section "Skeptical about Anthropogenic Warming or Impact". My blog has a new website, <a href="http://www.heliogenic.net/" rel="nofollow">www.heliogenic.net</a>. I would appreciate it if you would update the link. Thanks.<br /><br />John Blethen, Ph.D.jblethenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02033501838577051312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-54233436988359279202009-12-02T16:21:27.567-08:002009-12-02T16:21:27.567-08:00http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8389706....http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8389706.stm<br /><br />... * 1998 was an abnormally warm year because of the strong El Nino effect, whereas 2008 was cooled by the opposite phenomenon - La Nina - so choosing this period is "cherry-picking". <br /><br />Mike Lockwood, a physicist from the UK's Reading University whose work has helped quantify the relative influences of various factors on temperatures, is especially vehement about the third of these points.<br /><br />"Why pick a date other than it suits your argument?" he says.<br /><br />"If I take 1997 or 1999 as the starting point, temperatures rise; so what right have you got to take 1998? That's bad science - a really specious argument."...<br /><br />...The broad outline, though, deviates little from the IPCC's conclusions -unequivocal evidence of warming, more than 90% likelihood that humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases were principally to blame, projections of temperature and sea level rise, declining crop yields, mountain glacier melt, and considerable damage to ecosystems and the human economy.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11390933554403180294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-23143002971118012892009-02-13T12:20:00.000-08:002009-02-13T12:20:00.000-08:00I know this was not intended to be a humorous post...I know this was not intended to be a humorous post, but it gave me a good laugh nevertheless. I'm glad I found your interesting blog and I'm off to look around some more. It's always a relief to stumble upon another like-minded person. <BR/>A thanks & wave from an european geology grad.Marianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13932500290225616362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-42645838779234902722009-01-30T11:16:00.000-08:002009-01-30T11:16:00.000-08:00Since I am in the middle of an area ravaged by an ...Since I am in the middle of an area ravaged by an ice storm, it seems appropriate to talk about the weaknesses of the global warming theory.<BR/><A HREF="http://bloggingredneck.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow"><BR/>Computer models forecasting global warming are not scientific</A>Bluegrass Pundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13692965298692361473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-84723381266941552002009-01-28T12:52:00.000-08:002009-01-28T12:52:00.000-08:00I hope Mr Gore will make some, if only a small, im...I hope Mr Gore will make some, if only a small, impact on environmental issues. However, it is a shame that coverage on President Obama's short little vague speech about his stimulus package overshadowed Gore's words. But, them's the breaks.<BR/><BR/>http://politic.ology.com/2009/01/28/gore-testifies-on-env ...<BR/><BR/>-Jared J. H. Catapano (ology.com)j.catapanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15033046352973191844noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-32057472106922185282009-01-05T01:27:00.000-08:002009-01-05T01:27:00.000-08:00Not really. You need more of the full story.Not really. You need more of the <A HREF="http://neoporcupine.blogspot.com/2009/01/climate-is-cool-or-is-it.html" REL="nofollow">full story</A>.Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05665625863984599164noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-12540193835412777662009-01-04T16:05:00.000-08:002009-01-04T16:05:00.000-08:00.Throughout history cold periods have been the wor....<BR/>Throughout history cold periods have been the worst times for humanity, warm ones have been better for human prosperity.<BR/> <BR/>The CNN Meteorologist saying that the Man-Made Climate Change theory is "arrogant" is a great advancement in the cause of educating the masses with the truth. Hopefully more of the MSM will start speaking out. The word is spreading, tell all your friends and family, and tell them to do the same.<BR/><BR/>Gore and his Man-Bear-Pig. The politicians on board with this scam must be simply out of their minds.<BR/>For one thing, there’s plenty of oil and NG, we just need to drill for it and refine it. Also expand and improve nuclear, wind, hydro, solar and hemp fuel.<BR/><BR/>Can’t anybody talk some sense into Gore, McCain, Bush and Obama about how temperatures rise first, and THEN carbon-dioxide levels rise.<BR/>Carbon-dioxide doesn’t cause warming, sun activity does, warming causes CO2 levels to rise.<BR/>.<BR/>absurd thought -<BR/>God of the Universe says<BR/>humans’ breath is poison<BR/><BR/>just one child hurts the world<BR/>worse than a jet engine<BR/><BR/>.<BR/>absurd thought -<BR/>God of the Universe says<BR/>don't research all theories<BR/><BR/>put an end to all debate<BR/>silence all your critics<BR/><BR/>.<BR/>absurd thought -<BR/>God of the Universe says<BR/>spread hysteria<BR/><BR/>wildly exaggerate<BR/>scare little kids not ready<BR/><BR/>.<BR/>absurd thought -<BR/>God of the Universe says<BR/>keep people all worked up<BR/><BR/>about global warming<BR/>despite inconvenient facts<BR/>.<BR/>All real freedom starts with freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech there can be no real freedom.<BR/>.<BR/><A HREF="http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=-4123082535546754758" REL="nofollow">The Great Global Warming Scam Movie</A><BR/>.<BR/><A HREF="http://www.libertarian.to/images/animation/PhilosophyOfLiberty-english.swf" REL="nofollow">Philosophy of Liberty Cartoon</A><BR/>.<BR/><A HREF="http://www.lulu.com/content/2457373" REL="nofollow">USpace</A><BR/><BR/>:)<BR/>.Captain USpacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00786470726332272129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-38415486007807309922008-11-05T20:42:00.000-08:002008-11-05T20:42:00.000-08:00I really appreciate this blog..............I really appreciate this blog..............Tarun Kumarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06397604924870154146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4116637131602187413.post-72724211175732450312008-05-07T17:14:00.000-07:002008-05-07T17:14:00.000-07:00I'd tend to be even more skeptical of the various ...I'd tend to be even more skeptical of the various "annual temperature" records.<BR/><BR/>It doesn't seem reasonable that we could so easily declare, from any one or any presently feasible large number of climate indicators, that the "average temperature in year X over the entire world is Y". <BR/><BR/>And how are older data sets to be taken in light of better technology? Can we even compare 1915 readings or hurricane reports to 1998 data?Noghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10741030321448255586noreply@blogger.com